Support Header Image
Support

Support

Audio Solutions Question of the Week: Do You Have Any Tips for Miking a Theater and Staged Productions?

Do you have any tips for miking a theater and staged productions? Theater As a matter of fact, we do! In order to achieve consistent, high-quality audio for your performance, you need to develop a plan, just as with all other aspects of your show. There are a few schools of thought on how to achieve the best audio quality of a staged production and, as always, it depends on – and should be based off of – your specific situation. But using the best audio tools for your application will produce the best results. Boundary and hanging microphones

   U851R Boundary Microphone                                  U853RW Hanging Microphone (White)

Boundary and hanging microphones are often the go-to choice for enhancing audio of staged productions. Using hanging and boundary microphones that are stationary can provide general pickup of the entire performance area, allowing the performers to be heard in the audience. This, of course, requires good microphone placement and a well-tuned sound system. Remember, microphone placement is key! You may refer to our blog here on miking a choir; a lot of the same principles we outline for using mics on stands should be observed when using boundary and hanging microphones as well. The boundary/hanging microphone setup works well when the performers project their voices and the microphones are used to enhance the speech or singing. Small boundary and lavalier microphones

      BP896                                                            AT898cW

Small boundary and lavalier microphones may also be used as “plant” microphones hidden in scenery or props onstage. Low profile lavalier microphones, such as the BP896, which has a microphone diameter of only 2.6 mm (0.10"), are easily hidden on actors, props, or scenery. The low profile of the microphone keeps the visual aesthetic appealing to stage directors as they often “want to hear the microphone, but not see it.” The planted microphones may be wired or wireless. Wireless mics may make it easier to move set pieces on and off stage, but using standard XLR audio cable where possible will reduce the need for a large number of wireless signals, which could be problematic. headworn microphones

                 BP892cW-TH                              BP892cW with included AT8464 Dual Ear Mount

The most common microphone technique used is to have individual performers wear lavalier or headworn microphones. This is popular in performances where the number of personal microphones is not extravagant. With any and all wireless microphones, you must work within the limitations of the individual RF environment (see blog about using wireless). The individual performers are freely able to move around the performance area with consistently even audio reproduction. The difficulty with this technique lies in budget restrictions and in using the personal microphones in conjunction with the other types of microphones previously mentioned. This combination of techniques often creates an uneven audio level between those performers wearing personal microphones and those not. This may be done correctly, but it makes planning the placement of planted, boundary, and hanging microphones much more difficult. (See blog discussing which wireless microphones to use.) There may be applications where microphones for sound reinforcement are not even used. This allows the performers to use their instruments (i.e., their voices) to project and properly fill the performance area. Remember, microphones are often best used to enhance the sound! For further information on which microphones will best suit the needs of your theater production, you may contact the Audio Solutions Department.

Current Location English / $ USD

Change your location

United States

United States

Europe

Albania
Andorra
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Georgia
Iceland
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Netherlands
Spain
Hungary
Austria
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czechia
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Sweden
Ukraine
Turkey
Switzerland
Serbia
San Marino
Norway
North Macedonia
Montenegro
Monaco
Liechtenstein
Kazakhstan

Canada

Latin America

Argentina
Bolivia
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
Guatemala
Haiti
Honduras
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Uruguay
Venezuela

Africa

Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Comoros
DR Congo
Congo Republic
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Ivory Coast
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Sudan
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe

Asia

Vietnam
Yemen
Afghanistan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Japan
Jordan
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Lebanon
Macao
Malaysia
Maldives
Mongolia
Myanmar
Nepal
Oman
Pakistan
Philippines
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
South Korea
Sri Lanka
Syria
Taiwan, Province of China
Tajikistan
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Turkmenistan
United Arab Emirates
Uzbekistan
Vietnam
Yemen

Oceania

Australia
Fiji
Kiribati
Marshall Islands
Micronesia
Nauru
New Zealand
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Samoa
Solomon Islands
Tonga
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
Moldova