Support Header Image
Support

Support

Audio Solutions Question of the Week: What Are the Differences Between Hi-Fi and DJ/Broadcast Phono Cartridges?

Question: What are the differences between hi-fi and DJ/broadcast phono cartridges?

Answer: When shopping for a new turntable or selecting a new or replacement phono cartridge you may notice some substantial differences between the many models offered today. Differences not only in price, but in the materials used to make them and differences in their form and function. This post will focus on two types of cartridges, each designed with a specific application in mind. One designed with the goal of producing audio of the highest possible fidelity (usually within the confines of a given price point) for casual listening at home (hi-fi use), and the other with the primary goal of withstanding the rigors of heavy use and abuse in a commercial application such as that of a DJ, turntablist or broadcaster. Let’s look at some of the differences between the two so you can determine which is best for your application.

The Stylus

There are three basic stylus shapes, with multiple variations available for some of them. They are, spherical (conical), biradial (elliptical) and hyper-elliptical (line contact, MicroLine, Shibata etc.)

Audio Solutions Question of the Week: What Are the Differences Between Hi-Fi and DJ/Broadcast Phono Cartridges?

Conical- and elliptical-shaped styli are commonly used in commercial applications. The conical shape is recommended for heavy back-cueing and scratching, requirements typically found in commercial applications such as club or competition DJing. When intended specifically for this application, the “DJ cartridge” will also employ an enhanced suspension system designed to withstand the rigors of heavy use and abuse. The conical stylus is also suitable as an entry-level hi-fi stylus, offering a good performance-to-price ratio. Conical styli are durable, less fussy to align, can withstand higher tracking forces, and are low in cost due to the ease of manufacturing them.

The elliptical-shaped stylus may be used for light back-cueing and scratching, but is primarily designed to give professional DJs the best high-fidelity performance from their records. We use an elliptical-shape stylus on the AT-XP5 DJ Cartridge supplied with our AT-LP1240USB XP DJ Turntable. The longer side of the elliptical shape allows more contact with the groove wall, resulting in more detail to be extracted from the groove. Compared to the spherical stylus, the biradial stylus does a better job of tracking the inner grooves of a record. Distortion and record wear when tracking the inner grooves will be lower. The elliptical stylus offers improved sound and less wear at a slightly higher cost. The use of an alignment tool, such as a cartridge alignment protractor, is recommended when setting up a biradial stylus to obtain optimal performance.

The benefits of more detailed reproduction and lower tracking distortion also make the elliptical-shaped stylus a popular choice for listening at home, especially when used in conjunction with a better quality hi-fi system. These same benefits also make it a good choice for transferring records to a digital format where faithful transfer of the signal is paramount.

Hyper-elliptical styli can vary slightly in size, but just as importantly, their unique shapes provide added sonic benefits and lower contact pressure compared to less sophisticated styli. Lower noise and decreased record and stylus wear are major benefits of hyper-elliptical designs. Due to their complex shapes, the use of an alignment tool is highly recommended when setting up a hyper-elliptical styli.

If you have additional questions about styli or turntables, please contact the Audio Solutions Department for assistance.

Current Location English / $ USD

Change your location

United States

United States

Europe

Albania
Andorra
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Georgia
Iceland
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Netherlands
Spain
Hungary
Austria
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czechia
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Sweden
Ukraine
Turkey
Switzerland
Serbia
San Marino
Norway
North Macedonia
Montenegro
Monaco
Liechtenstein
Kazakhstan

Canada

Latin America

Argentina
Bolivia
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
Guatemala
Haiti
Honduras
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Uruguay
Venezuela

Africa

Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Comoros
DR Congo
Congo Republic
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Ivory Coast
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Sudan
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe

Asia

Vietnam
Yemen
Afghanistan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Japan
Jordan
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Lebanon
Macao
Malaysia
Maldives
Mongolia
Myanmar
Nepal
Oman
Pakistan
Philippines
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
South Korea
Sri Lanka
Syria
Taiwan, Province of China
Tajikistan
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Turkmenistan
United Arab Emirates
Uzbekistan
Vietnam
Yemen

Oceania

Australia
Fiji
Kiribati
Marshall Islands
Micronesia
Nauru
New Zealand
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Samoa
Solomon Islands
Tonga
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
Moldova