Support Header Image
Support

Support

Audio Solutions Question of the Week: What is the Difference Between the AT8699 and AT8699R Desk Stands?

What is the Difference Between the AT8699 and AT8699R Desk Stands?Audio Solutions Question of the Week: What is the Difference Between the AT8699 and AT8699R Desk Stands?

Question: What is the difference between the AT8699 and AT8699R Desk Stands?

Answer: Quite often a microphone desk stand solution is more preferable than a permanent shock mount solution for mounting a gooseneck microphone. A good example for this is in conference rooms or council meetings where a temporary or portable setup is needed. In those cases the AT8699 or the AT8699R would be a perfect option, allowing for quick setup/teardown or room configuration changes.

Before talking about the differences between these stands, let’s look at the similarities:

  • Heavy die-cast construction and non-slip bottom pads minimize coupling of surface vibration to the unit
  • Low-profile design with low-reflectance black finish for minimum visibility
  • Both are designed to connect a gooseneck microphone that has an XLR male connector
  • Reversible XLR-type connector on the top and the rear of the product

The primary difference between the two desk stands is the mute switch. The AT8699 does not have a mute switch. It is designed for simple use where the microphone is always active. The AT8699R has a programmable mute switch, allowing for three modes of operation: touch on/off, momentary on (touch to talk), or momentary off (touch to mute). This desk stand also features an LED mic-status indicator, and it can likewise control the LED on a connected ATUC or ES925/XLR gooseneck mic. Please note that in order to use the switch function the AT8699R requires phantom power.

As always, feel free to contact the Audio-Technica Audio Solutions Department for more information.

Current Location English / $ USD

Change your location

United States

United States

Europe

Albania
Andorra
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Georgia
Iceland
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Netherlands
Spain
Hungary
Austria
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czechia
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Sweden
Ukraine
Turkey
Switzerland
Serbia
San Marino
Norway
North Macedonia
Montenegro
Monaco
Liechtenstein
Kazakhstan

Canada

Latin America

Argentina
Bolivia
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
Guatemala
Haiti
Honduras
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Uruguay
Venezuela

Africa

Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Comoros
DR Congo
Congo Republic
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Ivory Coast
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
Sudan
Tanzania
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe

Asia

Vietnam
Yemen
Afghanistan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Japan
Jordan
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Lebanon
Macao
Malaysia
Maldives
Mongolia
Myanmar
Nepal
Oman
Pakistan
Philippines
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
South Korea
Sri Lanka
Syria
Taiwan, Province of China
Tajikistan
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Turkmenistan
United Arab Emirates
Uzbekistan
Vietnam
Yemen

Oceania

Australia
Fiji
Kiribati
Marshall Islands
Micronesia
Nauru
New Zealand
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Samoa
Solomon Islands
Tonga
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
Moldova